o1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen 2.5 72B
Compare o1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen 2.5 72B API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.
o1 (Reasoning) charges $15.00/1M input and $60.00/1M output tokens, compared to Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Qwen 2.5 72B is 42.9x cheaper on input tokens. In benchmark reasoning, o1 (Reasoning) holds the higher intelligence rating (98/100). For latency-critical streaming, o1 (Reasoning) delivers 45 t/s (1200ms TTFT) while Qwen 2.5 72B provides 110 t/s (290ms TTFT).
Full Metric & Specification Comparison
| Metric | o1 (Reasoning) | Qwen 2.5 72B | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba | - |
| Input Token Cost (1M) | $15.000 | $0.350 | Qwen 2.5 72B |
| Output Token Cost (1M) | $60.000 | $0.400 | Qwen 2.5 72B |
| Context Window | 200k tokens | 128k tokens | o1 (Reasoning) |
| Intelligence Benchmark Score | 98/100 | 89/100 | o1 (Reasoning) |
| Streaming Latency | Deliberate | Fast | - |
Key Architectural Takeaways
- Input Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $15.00/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M
- Output Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $60.00/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.40/1M
- Context Window: o1 (Reasoning) supports 200k tokens vs Qwen 2.5 72B with 128k tokens
- Benchmark Intelligence Rating: o1 (Reasoning) scores 98/100 vs Qwen 2.5 72B at 89/100
- Inference Latency: o1 (Reasoning) is rated Deliberate vs Qwen 2.5 72B rated Fast
Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference
Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.
Deploying Qwen 2.5 72B over o1 (Reasoning) saves $666.75/mo ($8001/yr) at this volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is o1 (Reasoning) cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B?
Qwen 2.5 72B is significantly more economical, charging $0.35/1M input compared to $15.00/1M for o1 (Reasoning).
Which model should I choose for production?
If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose Qwen 2.5 72B. If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, o1 (Reasoning) is recommended.
How does context window compare between o1 (Reasoning) and Qwen 2.5 72B?
o1 (Reasoning) offers the larger context window (200k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.
Related Model Head-to-Head Comparisons
Explore all 100+ comparisonsNever Miss an AI Token Price Cut
Whenever OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or DeepSeek drop their API rates or increase context windows, we send a 60-second summary so your team can cut bills immediately.