DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen 2.5 72B
Compare DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen 2.5 72B API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.
DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) charges $0.55/1M input and $2.19/1M output tokens, compared to Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Qwen 2.5 72B is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. In benchmark reasoning, DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) holds the higher intelligence rating (96/100). For latency-critical streaming, DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) delivers 65 t/s (650ms TTFT) while Qwen 2.5 72B provides 110 t/s (290ms TTFT).
Full Metric & Specification Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) | Qwen 2.5 72B | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba | - |
| Input Token Cost (1M) | $0.550 | $0.350 | Qwen 2.5 72B |
| Output Token Cost (1M) | $2.190 | $0.400 | Qwen 2.5 72B |
| Context Window | 128k tokens | 128k tokens | Tie |
| Intelligence Benchmark Score | 96/100 | 89/100 | DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) |
| Streaming Latency | Moderate | Fast | - |
Key Architectural Takeaways
- Input Token Cost: DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) is $0.55/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M
- Output Token Cost: DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) is $2.19/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.40/1M
- Context Window: DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) supports 128k tokens vs Qwen 2.5 72B with 128k tokens
- Benchmark Intelligence Rating: DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) scores 96/100 vs Qwen 2.5 72B at 89/100
- Inference Latency: DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) is rated Moderate vs Qwen 2.5 72B rated Fast
Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference
Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.
Deploying Qwen 2.5 72B over DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) saves $16.43/mo ($197/yr) at this volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B?
Qwen 2.5 72B is significantly more economical, charging $0.35/1M input compared to $0.55/1M for DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning).
Which model should I choose for production?
If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose Qwen 2.5 72B. If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) is recommended.
How does context window compare between DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) and Qwen 2.5 72B?
DeepSeek R1 (Reasoning) offers the larger context window (128k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.
Related Model Head-to-Head Comparisons
Explore all 100+ comparisonsNever Miss an AI Token Price Cut
Whenever OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or DeepSeek drop their API rates or increase context windows, we send a 60-second summary so your team can cut bills immediately.