o1 (Reasoning) vs o3-mini (Reasoning)
Compare o1 (Reasoning) vs o3-mini (Reasoning) API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.
o1 (Reasoning) charges $15.00/1M input and $60.00/1M output tokens, compared to o3-mini (Reasoning) at $1.10/1M input and $4.40/1M output. o3-mini (Reasoning) is 13.6x cheaper on input tokens. In benchmark reasoning, o1 (Reasoning) holds the higher intelligence rating (98/100). For latency-critical streaming, o1 (Reasoning) delivers 45 t/s (1200ms TTFT) while o3-mini (Reasoning) provides 95 t/s (580ms TTFT).
Full Metric & Specification Comparison
| Metric | o1 (Reasoning) | o3-mini (Reasoning) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI | - |
| Input Token Cost (1M) | $15.000 | $1.100 | o3-mini (Reasoning) |
| Output Token Cost (1M) | $60.000 | $4.400 | o3-mini (Reasoning) |
| Context Window | 200k tokens | 200k tokens | Tie |
| Intelligence Benchmark Score | 98/100 | 93/100 | o1 (Reasoning) |
| Streaming Latency | Deliberate | Fast | - |
Key Architectural Takeaways
- Input Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $15.00/1M vs o3-mini (Reasoning) at $1.10/1M
- Output Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $60.00/1M vs o3-mini (Reasoning) at $4.40/1M
- Context Window: o1 (Reasoning) supports 200k tokens vs o3-mini (Reasoning) with 200k tokens
- Benchmark Intelligence Rating: o1 (Reasoning) scores 98/100 vs o3-mini (Reasoning) at 93/100
- Inference Latency: o1 (Reasoning) is rated Deliberate vs o3-mini (Reasoning) rated Fast
Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference
Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.
Deploying o3-mini (Reasoning) over o1 (Reasoning) saves $625.50/mo ($7506/yr) at this volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is o1 (Reasoning) cheaper than o3-mini (Reasoning)?
o3-mini (Reasoning) is significantly more economical, charging $1.10/1M input compared to $15.00/1M for o1 (Reasoning).
Which model should I choose for production?
If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose o3-mini (Reasoning). If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, o1 (Reasoning) is recommended.
How does context window compare between o1 (Reasoning) and o3-mini (Reasoning)?
o1 (Reasoning) offers the larger context window (200k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.
Related Model Head-to-Head Comparisons
Explore all 100+ comparisonsNever Miss an AI Token Price Cut
Whenever OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or DeepSeek drop their API rates or increase context windows, we send a 60-second summary so your team can cut bills immediately.