TokenCalc AI
Head-to-Head Architectural Faceoff (2026 Live)

o1 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)

Compare o1 (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.

AI Overview & Search Executive Summary

o1 (Reasoning) charges $15.00/1M input and $60.00/1M output tokens, compared to Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.59/1M input and $0.79/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) is 25.4x cheaper on input tokens. In benchmark reasoning, o1 (Reasoning) holds the higher intelligence rating (98/100). For latency-critical streaming, o1 (Reasoning) delivers 45 t/s (1200ms TTFT) while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) provides 310 t/s (140ms TTFT).

Overall Winner
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)
Best Price/IQ Balance
Budget Winner
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) is 25.4x cheaper on input tokens
Coding & Logic
o1 (Reasoning)
Higher Benchmark Rating
Context Window
o1 (Reasoning)
Larger Document Context

Full Metric & Specification Comparison

Metrico1 (Reasoning)Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)Advantage
ProviderOpenAIMeta-
Input Token Cost (1M)$15.000$0.590Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)
Output Token Cost (1M)$60.000$0.790Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)
Context Window200k tokens128k tokenso1 (Reasoning)
Intelligence Benchmark Score98/10088/100o1 (Reasoning)
Streaming LatencyDeliberateUltra-Fast-

Key Architectural Takeaways

  • Input Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $15.00/1M vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.59/1M
  • Output Token Cost: o1 (Reasoning) is $60.00/1M vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.79/1M
  • Context Window: o1 (Reasoning) supports 200k tokens vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) with 128k tokens
  • Benchmark Intelligence Rating: o1 (Reasoning) scores 98/100 vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at 88/100
  • Inference Latency: o1 (Reasoning) is rated Deliberate vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) rated Ultra-Fast
Interactive Head-to-Head Simulator

Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference

Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.

Daily Input Tokens500,000 tokens
10k1M5M10M+
Daily Output Tokens250,000 tokens
5k500k2M5M+
o1 (Reasoning)OpenAI
$675.00/mo
$15.00/1M in · $60.00/1M out
IQ Score98/100
Throughput45 t/s
Context200k
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)Meta
97.8% Lower Cost
$14.78/mo
$0.59/1M in · $0.79/1M out
IQ Score88/100
Throughput310 t/s
Context128k
Net Financial Advantage

Deploying Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) over o1 (Reasoning) saves $660.23/mo ($7923/yr) at this volume.

See all o1 (Reasoning) alternatives →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is o1 (Reasoning) cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)?

Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) is significantly more economical, charging $0.59/1M input compared to $15.00/1M for o1 (Reasoning).

Which model should I choose for production?

If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together). If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, o1 (Reasoning) is recommended.

How does context window compare between o1 (Reasoning) and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)?

o1 (Reasoning) offers the larger context window (200k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.

Real-time API Price Alert Dispatch

Never Miss an AI Token Price Cut

Whenever OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or DeepSeek drop their API rates or increase context windows, we send a 60-second summary so your team can cut bills immediately.

Zero Spam•Unsubscribe in 1-click•Join 3,200+ AI Builders