TokenCalc AI
Head-to-Head Architectural Faceoff (2026 Live)

GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Compare GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.

AI Overview & Search Executive Summary

GPT-4o (Omni) charges $2.50/1M input and $10.00/1M output tokens, compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet at $3.00/1M input and $15.00/1M output. GPT-4o (Omni) is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens. In benchmark reasoning, Claude 3.5 Sonnet holds the higher intelligence rating (94/100). For latency-critical streaming, GPT-4o (Omni) delivers 90 t/s (420ms TTFT) while Claude 3.5 Sonnet provides 80 t/s (460ms TTFT).

Overall Winner
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Best Price/IQ Balance
Budget Winner
GPT-4o (Omni)
GPT-4o (Omni) is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens
Coding & Logic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Higher Benchmark Rating
Context Window
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Larger Document Context

Full Metric & Specification Comparison

MetricGPT-4o (Omni)Claude 3.5 SonnetAdvantage
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic-
Input Token Cost (1M)$2.500$3.000GPT-4o (Omni)
Output Token Cost (1M)$10.000$15.000GPT-4o (Omni)
Context Window128k tokens200k tokensClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Intelligence Benchmark Score92/10094/100Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Streaming LatencyFastFast-

Key Architectural Takeaways

  • Input Token Cost: GPT-4o (Omni) is $2.50/1M vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet at $3.00/1M
  • Output Token Cost: GPT-4o (Omni) is $10.00/1M vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet at $15.00/1M
  • Context Window: GPT-4o (Omni) supports 128k tokens vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet with 200k tokens
  • Benchmark Intelligence Rating: GPT-4o (Omni) scores 92/100 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 94/100
  • Inference Latency: GPT-4o (Omni) is rated Fast vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet rated Fast
Interactive Head-to-Head Simulator

Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference

Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.

Daily Input Tokens500,000 tokens
10k1M5M10M+
Daily Output Tokens250,000 tokens
5k500k2M5M+
GPT-4o (Omni)OpenAI
28.6% Lower Cost
$112.50/mo
$2.50/1M in · $10.00/1M out
IQ Score92/100
Throughput90 t/s
Context128k
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
$157.50/mo
$3.00/1M in · $15.00/1M out
IQ Score94/100
Throughput80 t/s
Context200k
Net Financial Advantage

Deploying GPT-4o (Omni) over Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves $45.00/mo ($540/yr) at this volume.

See all Claude 3.5 Sonnet alternatives →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-4o (Omni) cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

GPT-4o (Omni) is significantly more economical, charging $2.50/1M input compared to $3.00/1M for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Which model should I choose for production?

If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose GPT-4o (Omni). If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is recommended.

How does context window compare between GPT-4o (Omni) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers the larger context window (200k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.

Real-time API Price Alert Dispatch

Never Miss an AI Token Price Cut

Whenever OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or DeepSeek drop their API rates or increase context windows, we send a 60-second summary so your team can cut bills immediately.

Zero Spam•Unsubscribe in 1-click•Join 3,200+ AI Builders